During the summit, we were privvy to some interesting and exciting concepts in the blockchain and real estate markets. There remains one glaring issue surrounding all of this however; investment. Investments are always a tricky and sensitive subject for people and especially so for government. One of the appeals of crypto is that it allows users to interact regardless of the governements or societies around them. The drawback comes from offering unlicensed products or soliciting money from the public. In the US, for instance, one isn't allowed to publicly raise monies unless they go through an arduous disclosure and offering process unless the investors are foreigners or accredited. This falls into conflict with the goal of propy and propy adjacent products as well as many people's goals in the industry, namely, tying the digital asset space to a real asset for public investment. Once you tie the digital currencies to land and real assets, you run afoul of the authorities governing commodity and stock markets. Unless properly disclosed, filed, and operated. This runs directly in the face of the original appeal of crypto and poses a risk to send both industries into a tailspin. Hopefully someone much smarter than me can thread the needle here as we have personally helped and dealt with a similar case regarding debenture assets tied to real estate in Tampa Bay.